Dismissed

Rambinay @ Rambinod Chaudhary @ Bilai Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Nov 2024CR. MISC./61247/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought by a murder accused in custody for an offence under Sections 302, 201, 120(B), 34 IPC. The court noted the petitioner evaded arrest for 24 years and the trial is ongoing. Bail petition rejected; trial court asked to expedite the 2000 case.

What did the court decide?

None; bail petition rejected, with direction to the trial court to expedite the trial.

Rambinay @ Rambinod Chaudhary @ Bilai Chaudhary Vs The State… — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61247 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-98 Year-2000 Thana- BHAGWANPUR District- Begusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAMBINAY @ RAMBINOD CHAUDHARY @ BILAI CHAUDHARY Son of Late Munsi Chaudhary R/o Village - Raghunandanpur, P.S.- Bhagwanpur, District - Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravindra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Parmanand Prasad, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 27-11-2024 Heard Mr. Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the

¶13

petitioner and the State.

¶14

The petitioner is in judicial custody in connection with Sessions Trial No. 516/2024 arising out of Bhagwanpur P.S. Case No. 98 of 2000 for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120(B),34 of the IPC, lodged on 18.09.2020 by the informant, Ram Chandra Chaudhary.

¶15

As per the prosecution story lodged in the year 2000, the informant alleged that his younger son was called by the petitioner and other accused persons and thereafter, they left the place. He did not return till next morning whereafter, the search was made, when the accused persons informed that his son has gone to Delhi in search of work, though the informant

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61247 of 2024(4) dt.27-11-2024 2/2

¶17

had no belief on it, the search continued. Later, in the evening on Sunday when the relatives were participating in a Yagna , fowl smell came whereafter, in the dense forest, the decomposed body with insects all around it was found, he was identified as the son of the informant which followed the FIR.

¶18

Though, learned counsel for the petitioner tried to impress upon this Court that he has no role to play in the matter, learned APP submits that the FIR has been lodged in the year 2000 and for 24 years, the petitioner evaded arrest. The Sessions Trial No. 516/2024 is on.

¶19

Considering the submissions put forward by the parties as also the fact that for a quarter of century, the petitioner chose not to join the judicial proceeding, now that the trial is on, it would be appropriate that the same is taken to its logical conclusion.

¶20

The bail petition stands rejected.

¶21

Since the matter is of the year 2000, it is expected

¶22

that the Trial court will expedite the matter.

¶23

(Rajiv Roy, J)

¶24

perwez

¶25

U T

Rambinay @ Rambinod Chaudhary @ Bilai Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rambinay @ Rambinod Chaudhary @ Bilai Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashu Thakur @ Lalu Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Shambhu Yadav @ Shambhu Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Buchan Miyan Vs The State of Bihar

Sawan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bishavamitra Sharma @ Vishwamitra Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Ganesh Singh@ Ganesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar