Md. Ekbal Ahmad v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought quashing in a complaint case but did not appear on four consecutive dates; the High Court dismissed the petition for default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6043 of 2022
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4951 Year-2019 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District-
Patna
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sunil Kumar Pandey ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
ORAL ORDER
5 15-04-2024 This is 4th consecutive day when nobody appears on behalf of petitioners. Earlier, on 28.02.2024, 06.03.2024 and 13.03.2024 also, there was non-appearance on behalf of petitioners. It appears that petitioners have lost their interest to pursue the case. Learned A.P.P. for the State is present.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
anay/-
U T
Md. Ekbal Ahmad
Sarfaraz
The State of Bihar
Rukhsar Afrin
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court