Allowed

Digvijay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC23 Aug 2024CR. MISC./60166/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought modification of an anticipatory bail condition requiring a close family member as bailor, since no family member held landed property. The court allowed the modification, permitting a local bailor and extending the surrender period by four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Bail condition requiring own/close family member as bailor modified to permit a local bailor; surrender period extended four weeks.

Digvijay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60166 of 2024

¶2

¶3

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15168 of 2024

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-370 Year-2023 Thana- JOGAPATTI District- West Champaran

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Digvijay Kumar, Son of Suchendra Mahato, Resident of Village- Belsandi Ward No.03, Police Station- Gaunaha District- West Champaran

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Pushpa Sinha 1, APP ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 23-08-2024 Heard the parties.

¶14

At the outset, learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks permission to make necessary correction in the prayer portion of the present modification application, during the course of the day.

¶15

By the permission of the Court, let necessary correction be made in the prayer portion of the modification petition by the learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner.

¶16

By filing the present petition, the petitioner seeks modification of order dated 13.03.2024, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 15168 of 2024, whereby while granting anticipatory bail to the petitioner one of the condition has been imposed that one of the

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60166 of 2024(2) dt.23-08-2024 2/2

¶18

bailors shall be the own/close family members of the petitioner, which needs modification for the reason that no own/close family members of the petitioner has any landed property, worth Rs.10,000/-.

¶19

In view of the averments made in the modification application, the condition as noted hereinabove vide order dated 13.03.2024 stands modified. The petitioner is at liberty to produce a local bailor.

¶20

The period for surrender of the petitioner and for furnishing bail bonds is extended for a further period of four weeks from today.

¶21

The modification application stands allowed to the extent mentioned hereinabove.

¶22

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶23

uday/-

¶24

U T

Digvijay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Digvijay Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Muroul Block Fishermen Cooperative Society Ltd. and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Lalit Kumar Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Shamsha Khatoon Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rahul Sharma @ Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Fakruddin Vs The State of Bihar

Vishvajeet Rai @ Vishvajeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar