Santosh Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6007 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-441 Year-2023 Thana- SAHARSA SADAR District- Saharsa

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SANTOSH KUMAR DAS Son of Late Prakash Das Resident of VillageSarahi, Ward No. 5, P.S.-Saharsa, District-Saharsa.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

NEHA KUMARI W/o Santosh Kumar Das, D/o Narayan Das Resident of Village-Sarahi, Ward No. 5, P.S.-Saharsa, District-Saharsa. At PresentResident of Village-Dharhara, Ward No. 1, Post-Muradpur, P.S.-Nawhatta, District-Saharsa.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Mishra, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kanhiya Kishor, APP. Mr. Diwakar Prasad Singh, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

4 05-07-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel

¶14

for the opposite party no.2 and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498(A), 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section ¾ of Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Petitioner, who is husband of informant, is said to have tortured upon her physically and mentally and ousted her from her matrimonial home in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6007 of 2024(4) dt.05-07-2024 2/3

¶19

that the petitioner is an innocent person and has committed no offence. Petitioner has neither made any dowry demand nor drove the informant out of her matrimonial home nor tormented her over the demand of dowry. All the allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. He has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para 3 of the bail application.

¶20

Learned APP for the State as well as learned counsel for the informant opposes the prayer for bail. Learned counsel for the informant submits that petitioner is not ready to keep his wife with honour and dignity. Hence, he does not deserve the privilege of anticipatory bail.

¶21

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of punishment awarded under Section 498A i.e. 3 years, the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Saharsa Case No. 441 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6007 of 2024(4) dt.05-07-2024 3/3

¶23

If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement.

¶24

Accordingly, the writ application stands allowed.

¶25

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶26

divyanshi/-

¶27

U T

Santosh Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ganga Prasad Singh Vs The Dr. Rajendra Prasad Central Agricultural University, Pusa, Samastipur

Ram Ratan Prasad Singh Vs The Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University

Chhote Lal Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Saroj Paswan @ Saroj Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Palak Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Jitendra Das Vs The State of Bihar