Allowed

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2024CR. MISC./59851/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Miscellaneous No.59851 of 2024, the Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a case involving the recovery of illicit liquor punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner, accused of no personal involvement, was granted bail on furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000 and two sureties of like amounts each.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of petitioner on bail with a bond of Rs.20,000/- and two sureties of the like amount each.

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59851 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-183 Year-2024 Thana- KISHANPUR District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Manish Kumar Son of Sri Kalicharan yadav R/V- Village- Jarauli, Ward No.15, P.S.- Pipra, Distt.- Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrit Abhijat, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-08-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

A.P.P for the State.

¶14

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024 dated 22.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 240 litres of illicit Nepali country made liquor was recovered from the Wagon R Car.

¶16

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner is not the owner of the said seized

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59851 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/2

¶18

vehicle and the same was not being driven by him at the time of the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 22.07.2024.

¶19

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶20

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul, in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No. 183 of 2024.

¶21

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶23

Jyoti/-

¶24

U T

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manish Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uago Muni @ Ugo Muni Vs The State of Bihar

Anil Kumar @ Anil Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Kanhaiya Prasad Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Nitish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar @ Vimlesh Kumar @ Vimal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Hari Prasad @ Harishankar Kushvaha Vs The State of Bihar