Disposed

Madhu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Sept 2024CR. MISC./59705/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application for offences punishable up to seven years, with investigation continuing and Section 41A Cr.P.C. benefit allegedly not given. Court disposed of the application in terms of its earlier order in Naushad Ansari, permitting representation to the SP with directions to adhere to that order.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed in terms of order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024; liberty to represent to SP/IO within three weeks.

Madhu Devi Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59705 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2024 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Madhu Devi W/O Pankaj Yadav R/O Village- Mahuli, P.S- Mufasssil, District- Munger

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Raj Kishor Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Binod Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 18-09-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶12

APP for the State.

¶13

The learned APP at the outset submits that the

¶14

offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted carries punishment of seven years. The said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing and the petitioner has not been given the benefit of Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C., on which the learned APP submits that the anticipatory bail application be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of

¶16

2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

¶17

In view of the submissions made by the learned

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59705 of 2024(2) dt.18-09-2024 2/2

¶19

APP the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

¶20

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 within a period of three weeks from today and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the direction contained in the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

¶21

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

Madhu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhu Devi v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chathu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kishan Kumar @ Kishan Manohar Vs The State of Bihar

Sahrul @ Shakil Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Chand Vs The State of Bihar

Satyadeo Sahni @ Satyadeo Kumar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar