The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the criminal miscellaneous application with liberty to file a fresh application. The Court granted the liberty and dismissed the application as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5966 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-161 Year-2022 Thana- BIHARIGANJ District- Madhepura
======================================================
Rajendra Sharma @ Rajandar Sharma S/O Late Thithar Sharma, R/O VillageSarauni Kala, Ward No. 11, P.S- Bihariganj, Distt.- Madhepura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER
the petitioner and Mr. Murli Dhar, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Shahnawaz/- U T
Rajendra Sharma @ Rajandar Sharma
The State of Bihar
Rajesh Kumar Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
