Disposed

Dhananjay Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Sept 2024CR. MISC./59659/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application for offences punishable with seven years or less; disposed of in terms of a prior order, permitting the petitioner to seek compliance with Section 41(A) Cr.P.C. safeguards through representation to the Superintendent of Police.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed in terms of order dated 13-2-2024 in Cr. Misc. No. 3536 of 2024; liberty to file representation before SP within three weeks.

Dhananjay Mishra Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59659 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-252 Year-2019 Thana- BHABHU(KAIMUR) COMPLAIN C District- Kaimur (Bhabua)

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dhananjay Mishra Son Of Balkeshwar Mishra R/V- Village- Kurra, P.O.Akorhi, P.S.- Mohania, Distt.- Kaimur (BHABHUA), State- Bihar

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shahbaj Alam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶9

2 18-09-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶11

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No.252 of 2019 for the offences punishable

¶13

under Sections 323 and 354(b) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The learned APP submits that the offence for which the instant FIR has been instituted, carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner.

¶15

The learned counsel for the petitioner next

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59659 of 2024(2) dt.18-09-2024 2/3

¶17

submits that investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing, but then, the petitioner has not been granted the benefit of Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C, on which the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

¶18

In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

¶19

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case, within a period of three weeks from today, with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the state of Bihar); and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions

¶20

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59659 of 2024(2) dt.18-09-2024 3/3

¶21

contained in the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. the State of Bihar).

¶22

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶23

vikash/-

¶24

U T

Dhananjay Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhananjay Mishra v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chathu Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Kishan Kumar @ Kishan Manohar Vs The State of Bihar

Sahrul @ Shakil Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Chand Vs The State of Bihar

Satyadeo Sahni @ Satyadeo Kumar Sahni Vs The State of Bihar