The petitioner sought regular bail in an Arms Act case involving recovery of a country-made pistol. The High Court considered the custody period and criminal antecedents, granting bail with a bond and sureties.
Regular bail granted on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of like amount.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59485 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2024 Thana- PATAHI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Lal Babu Baitha Son of Ramyad Baitha @ Ram Ayad Baitha R/V- VILLAGEBELWA, P.S.- PIPRAHI, DISTT.- SHEOHAR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH
ORAL ORDER
3 26-10-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59485 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 2/2
possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 21.04.2024.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)
shivam/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail in Patahi P.S. Case No. 82 of 2024?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Lal Babu Baitha
The State of Bihar
Chandra Prakash Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
