Allowed¶22

Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Aug 2024CR. MISC./59332/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail; Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act Section 30(a); illicit Nepali liquor 42.750 litres; recovery from motorcycle; Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024; District Madhubani; Chandan Kumar Yadav; custody since 15.07.2024; one criminal antecedent; bail-bond Rs. 20,000 with two sureties; Chandra Prakash Singh, J; Patna High Court Cr. Misc. No. 59332 of 2024; order dated 19-08-2024.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted: petitioner to be enlarged on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024. ¶22

Chandan Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59332 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-213 Year-2024 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Kumar Yadav son of Vinod Yadav Village- padama Lagadi, PSLadaniya, Distt- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 19-08-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024 dated 14.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 42.750 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was recovered from the motorcycle.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner is not the owner of the said vehicle. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.59332 of 2024(2) dt.19-08-2024 2/2

¶19

the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.07.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 213 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

Jyoti/-

¶25

U T

Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akbar Ansari Vs The State of Bihar

Itiyakh Ahamad Vs the State of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Mithun Kumar Sahani @ Mintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Mithu Rai @ Mithu Ray Vs The State Of Bihar

Govind Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar