Oral order dismissing an anticipatory bail application. The petitioner alleged false implication in a murder case under IPC 302/34. The court rejected bail despite no external injury on the deceased. No prior criminal record was noted.
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected and application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57673 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-152 Year-2023 Thana- VISHAMBHARPUR District- Gopalganj
====================================================== DHARICHHAN YADAV @ DHARICHAN YADAV SON OF LATE LALU YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE - SIPAYA KHAS, P.S. - BISHAMBHARPUR, DISTRICT - GOPALGANJ
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57673 of 2024(2) dt.11-09-2024 2/2
of deceased, the doctor has not found any external injury over the body of the deceased and cause of death is Asphyxia due to
hanging. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)
shikha/-
U T
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to a petitioner alleged to be implicated in dowry-related murder causing death by hanging?
Whether the absence of external injury on the deceased shifts the petitioner from the nexus of the offence at the anticipatory bail stage?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dharichhan Yadav @ Dharichan Yadav
The State of Bihar
Anjani Kumar Sharan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
