Allowed

Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC7 Aug 2024CR. MISC./57357/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous application, the Patna High Court interfered with the grant of regular bail to the petitioner in an excise case involving recovery of country made liquor, directing him to furnish a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Allowed the application and ordered the petitioner to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs.20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount.

Bittu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57357 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-699 Year-2024 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bittu Kumar Son of Raju Yadav R/O Vill.- Kharhari, P.S.- Muffasil in the Dist. of Gaya.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Braj Nandan Kumar Tiwary, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Indu Kumari Srivastava, APP ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 07-08-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶15

A.P.P for the State.

¶16

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 699 of 2024 dated 13.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶17

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 50 litres of illicit country made liquor was recovered from the Motorcycle.

¶18

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the owner of the said vehicle. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner.

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57357 of 2024(2) dt.07-08-2024 2/2

¶20

The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 14.07.2024.

¶21

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently

¶22

opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶23

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned,

¶24

Gaya, in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 699 of 2024.

¶25

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶26

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶27

Jyoti/-

¶28

U T

Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bittu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Paswan @ Rajan Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Anant Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Neeraj Kumar Jha Vs the State of Bihar

Nishu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kedar Dom Vs The State of Bihar

Rajeev Kumar @ Om Vs The State of Bihar