Allowed

Vidhan Rai @ Bidhan Kumar @ Vidhan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Oct 2024CR. MISC./56986/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, held in jail for misuse of previous bail conditions, was granted bail in a robbery case under Sections 395, 397, and 412 IPC. The court considered the period of custody and the undertaking to cooperate with the trial, releasing the petitioner after charge framing on furnishing bail bonds with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail after framing of charge on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties.

Vidhan Rai @ Bidhan Kumar @ Vidhan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56986 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2011 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Vidhan Rai @ Bidhan Kumar @ Vidhan Kumar Son Of Sri Bijendra Rai @ Bichchu Ray Resident Of Village - Saguna Gandhi Murti, P.S. - Danapur, District - Patna

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ravi Kant Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 26-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶11

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Session Trial No. 840 of 2012 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No. 65 of 2011 registered for the offence under Sections 395, 397, 412 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

This is a case of misuse of conditions of bail. The petitioner is in jail since 24.05.2024.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner will appear regularly either personally or through his advocate in the trial Court and he will not misuse the privilege of bail.

¶14

Considering the period of custody and also

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56986 of 2024(4) dt.26-10-2024 2/2

¶16

considering the fact that this is a case of misuse of conditions of bail, this application is allowed.

¶17

Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail

¶18

after framing of charge if charge has not already been framed , on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge VI, Danapur concerned Court in connection with Session Trial No. 840 of 2012 arising out of Danapur P.S. Case No. 65 of 201.

¶19

After the release, the petitioner will co-operate in the trial either by appearing personally or through his lawyer in the trial Court on each and every date fixed by the trial Court. Noncompliance of the condition will result in cancellation of the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶20

(Sandeep Kumar, J)

¶21

Harshita/-

¶22

U T

Vidhan Rai @ Bidhan Kumar @ Vidhan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vidhan Rai @ Bidhan Kumar @ Vidhan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baiju Lal Thakur @ Baiju Lal Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Dinesh Ray Vs The State of Bihar

Umesh Ram Vs the State of Bihar

Amir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonelal Sahani Vs The State of Bihar

Chhotu Kumar @ Chhtou Kumar Vs The State of Bihar