Allowed

Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC21 Aug 2024CR. MISC./56816/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Harish Kumar, J. granted regular bail to the petitioner, a vehicle driver implicated in a case for trafficking illicit wine, upon furnishing bond with sureties and complying with specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Shall be released on bail on furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each, subject to conditions of appearing in trial and not tampering with evidence.

Niranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56816 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2024 Thana- BICHKODWA District- Jamui

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Niranjan Kumar S/O Krishnandan Singh @ Kishnandan Singh R/O VillageMalpur, P.S.-Pipariya, District-Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 21-08-2024

¶12

Heard Mr. Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, learned

¶13

counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with Bichkodwa P.S. Case No. 26 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶15

The police on a tip-off regarding trafficking of illicit wine, intercepted Chevorlet car bearing registration no. WB44C0674. The petitioner is said to be the driver of the vehicle. In course of search, 132 liters of Indian Made Foreign Liquor was recovered.

¶16

It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner happens to be driver of the vehicle in question. He

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56816 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 2/3

¶18

was plying the vehicle on the instruction of his owner and, in fact, he was not aware of the fact as to what was loaded by the owner of the vehicle. However, only on account of past criminal antecedent of identical nature, the name of the petitioner has been implicated in this case. There are various other infirmities in the search and seizure and the witnesses are none else but the police personnel. It is further contended that be that as it may, now the petitioner is in custody since 07.06.2024.

¶19

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposed the bail application and submitted that the antecedent of the petitioner speaks loud of the involvement of the petitioner in the present crime.

¶20

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that the investigation of the crime is complete and moreover the petitioner is said to be the driver of the vehicle from which the recovery has been made, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Excise Court-I, Jamui in connection with Bichkodwa P.S. Case No. 26 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56816 of 2024(2) dt.21-08-2024 3/3

¶22

the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶23

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of

¶24

the trial.

¶25

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶26

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶27

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶28

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶29

rohit/-

¶30

U T

Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Niranjan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Kitabuddin Vs The State of Bihar

Rameshwar Tiwari Vs The State of Bihar

Vijendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Abhiram Yadav @ Adhiram Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Renu Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Dilkhush Kumar @ Dil Khush Kumar @ Dilkhush Vs the State of Bihar