Disposed

Sharvan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Sept 2024CR. MISC./55744/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in an IPC Sections 393/34 case carrying punishment of seven years or less, alleging he was not given the benefit of Section 41(A) CrPC. The court disposed of the application in terms of its earlier order in Naushad Ansari and directed compliance by police.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed in terms of the 13.02.2024 Naushad Ansari order; liberty to file representation before SP within three weeks; directions for strict compliance and circulation of that order.

Sharvan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55744 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2024 Thana- SONEPUR District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sharvan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar S/o Lal Babu Ray R/o vill - Govindchak, P.S - Sonepur, Distt. - Saran at Chapra

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjit Kumar Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 04-09-2024

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned APP Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No.341/2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 393/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

The learned APP at the outset submits that the offences for which the instant F.I.R. has been instituted against the petitioner carries a punishment of 7 years and less. The said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the investigation in the case against the petitioner is still continuing but the petitioner has not been given the benefit of Section 41(A) Cr.P.C., on which, the learned APP submits that the case be

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55744 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/4

¶17

disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar).

¶18

In view of the submission made by the learned APP the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar).

¶19

The petitioner would be at liberty to file a representation within a period of three weeks from today before the concerned Superintendent of Police of the district and the Investigating Officer of the case with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar) and the Superintendent of Police shall ensure that Investigating Officer of the case strictly adhere to the direction contained in the said order.

¶20

At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it appears that the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Saran acts mechanically and has scant regards for the order of this court. It is further submitted that this Court by its order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar) has clearly directed that as to how an accused is to be treated against whom an F.I.R. is instituted carrying punishment of 7 years and less

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55744 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 3/4

¶22

and the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar) also records the consequences of its breach. The learned counsel next submits that the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Saran in complete breach of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar) has passed the order impugned even without verifying that as to whether the petitioner was given the benefit of Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C. or not. It is also submitted that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent.

¶23

The Court completely concurs with the submissions of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner but then fails to appreciate the conduct of the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra and the I.O. of the case that as to why the benefit of Section 41(A) of the Cr.P.C. was not given to the petitioner in compliance of the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar).

¶24

The Court for the present restrains itself from passing any adverse order against the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Saran, the S.P., Saran at Chapra and the I.O. of the case, but then directs them to download the order dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari

¶25

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55744 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 4/4

¶26

vs. State of Bihar) for their perusal.

¶27

The Court expects that next time, such mechanical order would not be passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Saran and the S.P., Saran at Chapra and the I.O. of the case shall remain careful and shall ensure that the dated 13.02.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar) is not breached with impunity, failing which,

¶28

the Court would be constrained to initiate departmental/contempt proceeding against the erring judicial officer and the police officials.

¶29

Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned Sessions Judge, Saran at Chapra and the Superintendent of police, Saran at Chapra for its onward communication to learned Additional Sessions Judge-XII, Saran at Chapra and the I.O of the case for their perusal and necessary action.

¶30

The learned APP Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad shall also communicate the order to the Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra.

¶31

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶32

amit/-

¶33

U T

Sharvan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharvan Kumar @ Sharwan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chintu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Satendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar @ Krish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kumar Amrit Raj Vs the Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation, Anti Corruption Branch, S.K. Singh

Satyendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Sonelal Khatabe @ Sonelal Chaupal @ Sonelal Khatbe Vs The State of Bihar