Allowed

Baldeo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Aug 2024CR. MISC./55601/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application in an excise case involving alleged recovery of 50 litres of country-made liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner claimed false implication and no conscious possession. Considering custody since 02.07.2024 and circumstances, the High Court allowed bail on bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, Gaya.

Baldeo Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55601 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-103 Year-2024 Thana- TANKUPPA District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Baldeo Yadav SON OF RAMJI YADAV VILLAGE- LAXMIPUR, PSTANKUPPA, DIST- GAYA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prithivi Raj Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 05-08-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 103 of 2024 dated 01.07.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

As per the prosecution case, total 50 litres of country made liquor was from the motorcycle.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is not the owner of the said motorcycle. The name of the petitioner has come in this case on mere suspicion. The petitioner has no concern with

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55601 of 2024(2) dt.05-08-2024 2/2

¶19

the alleged recovery. The petitioner has two criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 02.07.2024.

¶20

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed

¶21

the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gaya in connection with Tankuppa P.S. Case No. 103 of 2024.

¶23

The application stands allowed.

¶24

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶25

shivam/-

¶26

U T

Baldeo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Baldeo Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subhkant Thakur Vs The State of Bihar

Shivam Tiwary @ Sanskar Tiwary Vs the State of Bihar

Deepak Kumar Bharti @ Deepak Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Md Arif Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Tiwary @ Bakal Vs The State of Bihar

Suresh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar