Petitioner in a pre-arrest application was arrested during its pendency; counsel sought withdrawal as infructuous, and the petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54718 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2024 Thana- KHAIRA District- Jamui
======================================================
Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav S/O Ramswrup Yadav R/O Village And Post- Mangobandar, P.S- Khaira, Distt.- Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rita Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 28-08-2024
Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the
petitioner submits that during the pendency of the petition, the petitioner stands arrested and in that background, it has become infructuous.
petition.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
U T
Pawan Yadav @ Pawan Kumar Yadav
The State Of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
