Section 482 CrPC application to quash cognizance taken for Sections 323/379/504 IPC offences; court found no illegality in the trial court's or Sessions Judge's orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54639 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-627 Year-2015 Thana- MUNGER COMPLAINT CASE District- Munger
======================================================
Murlidhar Mishra S/o Late Gorelal Mishra, R/o Mohalla- Badi Daulatpur Gumti Road, P.S.- Jamalpur , District- Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Kumari Jaiswal ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
2 24-07-2024 The petitioner has approached this Court by filing
the instant application under Section 482 of the CrPC, praying for quashing the order dated 12th June 2018 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Munger in Cr. Revision 25/2016, whereby and whereunder, he dismissed the said criminal revision and affirmed the order of cognizance dated 3/4 January 2016 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate Ist Class, Munger, for the offence committed under Sections 323/379/504 of the IPC.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54639 of 2018(2) dt.24-07-2024 2/2
the witness, the trial court correctly found materials for the offence under Sections 323/504 and 379 of the IPC for further proceeding against the accused person. This Court does not found any illegality in the said impropriety in the said order of taking cognizance or the order passed in revision by the concerned learned Sessions Judge.
482 of the CrPC is dismissed.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
Suraj Dubey/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the cognizance order dated 3/4 January 2016 under Sections 323/504 and 379 IPC and its affirmation in revision should be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Murlidhar Mishra
State of Bihar
Smt. Meena Devi
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
