Petitioners in a criminal miscellaneous case were acquitted in the underlying complaint case; as a result the application under Section 482 CrPC had become infructuous and was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54279 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-840 Year-2017 Thana- NAWADAH COMPLAINT CASE District- Nawada
======================================================
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
It is submitted by the learned Advocate for the petitioners that the petitioners have been acquitted of the charge against them in Complaint Case no. 840/2017 vide an order dated 10th February 2023.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
Suraj Dubey/-
U T
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sahadeo Pandit
Dani Pandit @ Dani Lal Pandit
Jay Ram Pandit
Guleshwar Pandit
Bhagirath Pandit
Anil Pandit @ Anil Kumar
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
