Disposed

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Aug 2024CR. MISC./54089/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in a PC & PNDT Act complaint case where offences carry punishment below seven years. Court disposed of the application in terms of its earlier order in Naushad Ansari, permitting representation to the Superintendent of Police for adherence to Section 41(A) Cr.P.C. safeguards during investigation.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed in terms of Naushad Ansari order; liberty to represent to SP and IO within three weeks for Section 41(A) CrPC compliance.

Sanjay Yadav Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54089 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2024 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Sanjay Yadav son of Jayram Singh @ Jayram Yadav Village-Po- Chaugain Ps- Murar Dist- Buxar

¶5

Shambhu Yadav @ Shambhu Prasad Singh son of Jayram Singh @ Jayram Yadav At Po- Chaugain Ps- Murar Dist- Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gopal Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 29-08-2024

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and

¶13

the learned APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.01(O)/2024, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 22(1), 23(1), 23(3) and 25 of PC & PNDT Act, 1994.

¶15

The learned APP at the outset submits that the offences for which the instant F.I.R. has been instituted against the petitioners carries a punishment of less than 7 years. The said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. The learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54089 of 2024(2) dt.29-08-2024 2/2

¶17

investigation in the case against the petitioners is still continuing but the petitioners have not been given the benefit of Section 41(A) Cr.P.C., on which, the learned APP submits that the case be disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar).

¶18

In view of the submission made by the learned APP the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar).

¶19

The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation within a period of three weeks from today before the concerned Superintendent of Police of the district and the Investigating Officer of the case with a web copy of the order dated 13.02.2024 in Cr. Misc. No.3536/2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. State of Bihar) and the Superintendent of Police shall ensure that Investigating Officer of the case strictly adhere to the direction contained in the said order.

¶20

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶21

amit/-

¶22

U T

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjay Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmeshwar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Ray @ Raj Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Somnath Manjhi @ Shubhnath Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar