Allowed

Dinesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC29 Aug 2024CR. MISC./53856/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case of alleged enticement of the informant's minor daughter, alleging false implication arising out of a passage dispute. The court granted anticipatory bail subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions, upon arrest or surrender within six weeks.

Dinesh Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53856 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-146 Year-2024 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Dinesh Singh son of Rudal Singh Village- Gangpur Siswan Ps- Siswan Distsiwan

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Ajay Singh son of Late Ramji singh Village- Gangpur Siswan Ps- Siswan Dist- Siwan

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Indrajeet Bhushan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 29-08-2024

¶12

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363 and 366A of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 8 and 12 of POCSO Act.

¶14

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is aged about 55 years and is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that his minor daughter, aged about 17 years on 6-5-2024 at 3:00 pm, went to attend natures call, but did not return, on search he came to know that calls from different mobile numbers as detailed in the FIR came

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53856 of 2024(2) dt.29-08-2024 2/3

¶16

and his daughter talked to them, thus alleges that holder of mobile numbers enticed his daughter away for marriage.

¶17

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that petitioner and informant are having dispute relating to passage, as informant by encroaching Garmajarua aam land has created obstruction in the egress of the petitioner from his land, for which petitioner instituted a proceeding under Section 133 Cr.P.C bearing M.N. Case No. 2383 of 2017 against the informant in the court of SDM, accordingly, order dated 22-5-2018 was passed for removing the enforcement, but the informant did not remove the enforcement, thus petitioner again filed an application before the SDM on 191-2021.

¶18

5. It is next submitted that the victim was recovered on 12-5-2024, and her statement was recorded by the police under Section 161 Cr.P.C wherein she stated that she left her home as her mother had scolded for being photographed with Abhishek Kumar, but in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C has stated that the petitioner made a video when Abhishek was trying to outrage her modesty. It is also submitted that the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C was

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53856 of 2024(2) dt.29-08-2024 3/3

¶20

recorded under parental pressure.

¶21

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶22

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Siswan P.S. Case No. 146 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶23

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶24

SUMIT/-

¶25

U T

Dinesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinesh Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Parmeshwar Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Manoj Singh @ Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Raj Kumar Ray @ Raj Kumar Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Sharma Vs the State of Bihar

Somnath Manjhi @ Shubhnath Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Ram Kumar Mishra Vs The State of Bihar