Allowed

Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Sept 2024CR. MISC./53733/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to an accused charged under Sections 376, 504, 506, and 34 IPC. The court noted the victim was a major and that the relationship appeared consensual based on the FIR narrative and admission by the victim's parents, leading to the release of the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to standard conditions.

Raja Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.53733 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2024 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Raja Kumar, Son of Kailash Ram, R/O Vill.- Jayaj Patti, ward no 23, P.s.Dalsinghsarai, Dist.- Samastipur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Thakur Brajesh Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, Advocate ======================================================

¶7

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR

¶8

3 25-09-2024

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

Heard learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the

¶11

petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶12

The application for grant of bail to the petitioner who is in custody in connection with Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 376, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The allegation against the petitioner is of sexually exploiting the informant on pretext of marriage.

¶14

Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner contended that from the narratives made in the FIR it is evident that the victim is major and for the last three years both the parties were in relationship and thus, prima facie it appears to be consensual in nature. It is further contended that during the course of investigation the statement of the parents of the victim girl was recorded and they have admitted this fact

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53733 of 2024(3) dt.25-09-2024 2/3

¶16

that the victim is a married girl whose marriage was solemnized in the year 2022 with one Vikash Kumar, S/o Pannalal Ram, resident of Samastipur. A categorical statement has been made in this regard in paragraph no. 7 of the bail application. It is also the contention of the petitioner that the FIR is lodged when the marriage of the petitioner was solemnized with one another lady in the year 2024, which was being opposed by the informant. The petitioner has been incarcerated since 07.04.2024 and the investigation of the crime is complete.

¶17

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that on the pretext of marriage the victim informant was sexually exploited at the hands of the petitioner and later on he refused to solemnize marriage.

¶18

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the allegation levelled in the FIR suggesting a long continuous relationship which prima facie speaks about the consensus of the parties, coupled with the fair antecedent and the period of custody, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Dalsinghsarai, Samastipur in connection

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.53733 of 2024(3) dt.25-09-2024 3/3

¶20

with Dalsingh Sarai P.S. Case No. 86 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶21

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the

¶22

trial.

¶23

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶24

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶25

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶26

(v) The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take immediate step for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds, in terms of the above-mentioned order, shall not be delayed for this purpose or in the name of verification.

¶27

supratim/-

¶28

U T

¶29

(Harish Kumar, J)

Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Raja Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhimanyu Sharma Vs The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary

Balram Dubey Vs The State of Bihar

Alok Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sahil Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Ashish Choudhary @ Ashish Chaudhary Vs the State of Bihar