Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. sought quashing of a 2014 complaint case in which charge had been framed and complainant witnesses examined before charge. The court held proceedings at this advanced stage could not be quashed and dismissed the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52870 of 2016
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2949 Year-2014 Thana- MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
Indradeo Prasad Sinha Son of late Maheshwar Prasad Sinha Resident of Village- Basauli Himat Singh, P.S. Bochahan, District-Muzaffarpur Presently residing at Gupta Lane Amgola P.S. Kazi Mohammadpur, DistrictMuzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Grijendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Asha Kumari, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER
4 04-07-2024
The instant criminal miscellaneous application under
Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing of criminal proceeding being Complaint Case No.2949 of 2014.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52870 of 2016(4) dt.04-07-2024 2/2
accordingly, rejected and the instant Criminal Misc. Case is
dismissed.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)
mdrashid/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a complaint case pending at the post-charge evidence stage can be quashed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Indradeo Prasad Sinha
State of Bihar
Braj Nandan Prasad Srivastava
Bibek Chaudhuri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
