Allowed

Peeyush Pratik v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC10 Jul 2024CR. MISC./5206/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Husband sought anticipatory bail in a dowry cruelty case; dispute resolved via mediation report dated 16.05.2024, unchallenged by opposite party no. 2. Court allowed bail upon arrest or surrender within six weeks on bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted: petitioner enlarged on Rs.10,000 bond with two sureties if arrested/surrenders within six weeks, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Peeyush Pratik Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5206 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-86 Year-2023 Thana- MAHILA P.S. District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Peeyush Pratik son of Sunil Kumar Srivastava R/o- Flat no- 104, Shivam ResGarden Maurya Path Ps- Rajeev Nagar Dist- Patna

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar

¶8

Smriti Shreya wife of Peeyush Pratik Moh- Indrapuri road No-6, H.No-35, Keshari Nagar Ps- Patliputra Dist- patna

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bajarangi Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rana Randhir Singh, A.P.P. Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 10-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶14

The petitioner who is husband of opposite party

¶15

No. 2 apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has already been resolved through the process of mediation vide Mediator’s Report dated 16.05.2024 and terms of settlement mutually agreed upon by the parties is attached with the Mediator’s Report kept at Flag ‘M’.

¶17

Learned counsel for the O.P. No. 2 does not dispute the contention made on behalf of the petitioner.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5206 of 2024(3) dt.10-07-2024 2/2

¶19

In view of the fact that the dispute between the parties has been resolved, this anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna in connection with Mahila P. S. Case No. 86 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶21

Navya/-

¶22

U T

Peeyush Pratik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Peeyush Pratik v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikash Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Bimal Kumar Bharti Vs The State of Bihar

Mukesh Manjhi @ Mukesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rina Tudu @ Rani Tudu Vs The State of Bihar

Shiv Shankar Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Mithilesh Mandal Vs The State of Bihar