Allowed

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Aug 2024CR. MISC./51985/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail application under Sections 411, 413, 414 and 34 IPC relating to recovery of motorcycle-breaking tools and keys. Court granted bail considering period of custody, with condition of physical appearance on every date before the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000 with two sureties of like amount, to the satisfaction of A.C.J.M.-VIII, Darbhanga, with condition of appearance on every date.

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51985 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- Nehra District- Darbhanga

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Chandan Kumar son of Verendra Kumar Singh @ Virendra Kumar Singh R/oBela Kothi Ps- Khajauli Dist- Madhubani

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶10

ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 13-08-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nehra P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024 dated 08.04.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 411, 413, 414 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, two miscreants boarded on a motorcycle tried to flee away on seeing the police but they were apprehended who disclosed their name as Krishna Kumar Singh and the petitioner Chandan Kumar. On search of the coaccused Krishna Kumar Singh one instrument used for breaking of lock of the motorcycle and one mobile phone were recovered from his possession and two keys of motorcycle were also recovered from the possession of the petitioner.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51985 of 2024(2) dt.13-08-2024 2/2

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2024.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-VIII, Darbhanga in connection with Nehra P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024, with the condition:-

¶20

(i) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner are liable to be cancelled.

¶21

The application stands allowed.

¶22

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶23

shivam/- U T

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandan Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Jammu Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Paswan @ Ajay Kumar Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Kumar Singh Vs The Union of India through its Nd.P.S.

Aatif Ali Vs The State of Bihar

Manish Kumar Singh @ Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar