Allowed

Rohit Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Sept 2024CR. MISC./51839/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought anticipatory bail for alleged chain-snatching and assault during a PDS distribution dispute, with Section 307 IPC alleged. The High Court granted conditional anticipatory bail subject to surrender within six weeks, Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions, a parent bailor, and liberty to cancel bonds on non-cooperation.

What did the court decide?

Conditional anticipatory bail: release on Rs.10,000 bond with two like sureties upon arrest/surrender within six weeks, one bailor the father, subject to Section 438(2) Cr.P.C. conditions.

Rohit Dubey Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51839 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2024 Thana- Dhobaha District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rohit Dubey Son of Bhalu Dubey R/O Vil.- Salempur, P.s.- Dhobaha, Ara Mufassil, Dist.- Bhojpur at Ara.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shubham Sourav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 09-09-2024

¶11

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of five cases, two of which under the Excise Act and the informant alleges that he had gone to attend a marriage where Prem tried to strangulate him and petitioner snatched his chain and Rs. 5,300/- and the cause of occurrence is that the informant had objected and videographed the distribution of less grains by Dadan Dubey, a PDS dealer, to the beneficiary.

¶15

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51839 of 2024(3) dt.09-09-2024 2/3

¶17

informant. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting, then from bare perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, no offence under Section 307 of the IPC is made out. It is next submitted that since petitioner is related to Dadan Dubey as such he has been implicated. It is further submitted that petitioner will not abscond rather will cooperate in the investigation for proving his innocence.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dhobaha P.S. Case No. 08 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

7. One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his father, Bhalu Dubey.

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51839 of 2024(3) dt.09-09-2024 3/3

¶22

8. However, it is made clear that in the event, if the Investigating Officer of the case files an application before the learned trial court bringing to its notice that the petitioner, despite giving assurance to this Court, is not cooperating in the investigation or is not presenting himself as and when required, the learned trial court shall be at liberty to forthwith cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner after recording reasons.

¶23

9. Let a copy of this order be sent to the concerned P.S. through the learned Trial court.

¶24

(Satyavrat Verma, J)

¶25

SUMIT/-

¶26

U T

Rohit Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rohit Dubey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar @ Amit Sahu Vs The State of Bihar

Sujit Kumar @ Sujit Kumar Das Vs The State of Bihar

Sanjiv Rai @ Sanjeeb Rai Vs the State of Bihar

Paspati Singh @ Pashupati Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mantu Choudhary @ Abhishek Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sudhir Kumar Vs the State of Bihar