Allowed

Devilal Sada v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Jul 2024CR. MISC./5005/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court granted regular bail to the petitioner facing trial for offences under Section 307 IPC and relevant sections of the Arms Act. The Court noted the petitioner's lack of criminal history, the long period of judicial custody, and the trial court's confirmation that the trial would conclude within a reasonable time.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Devilal Sada Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.5005 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-973 Year-2021 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Devilal Sada Son of Dukhi Sada R/o vill - Arraha, ward no. 5, Near Kali Mandir, P.S. - Ghailarh, Distt. - madhepura

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Vishoka Nand For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Rina Sinha ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

5 05-07-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner has renewed his prayer for grant of regular bail, registered for the offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-b) (a), 26, 27 of the Arms Act, which was earlier dismissed as withdrawn by this Court vide order dated 28.6.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 72866 of 2022 with a direction to trial court to conclude the trial within six months failing which petitioner will be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail.

¶13

As per allegation in the FIR, petitioner fired upon informant’s daughter, namely, Guddi Devi which hit right side of her stomach. Reason behind the occurrence is that this petitioner wants to marry with Guddi Devi, whose marriage was solemnized with another person.

¶14

In compliance of order dated 2.2.2024, a progress report

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.5005 of 2024(5) dt.05-07-2024 2/2

¶16

dated 6.2.2024 sent by Addl. Sessions Judge-III, Madhepura has been received which suggests that trial is likely to be concluded in one year.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no hope to conclude the trial in near future. He further submits that petitioner has got no criminal history and he is languishing in judicial custody since 08.09.2022.

¶18

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for

¶19

the State.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the period of custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhepura in connection with Madhepura (Ghailarh) P.S. Case No. 973 of 2021.

¶21

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶22

sushma/-

¶23

Devilal Sada v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Devilal Sada v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amar Nath Dubey @ Prem Shankar Dubey Vs the State of Bihar

Munilal Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ashok Prasad Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Upendra Sah @ Beltor Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Syed Abu Dojana Vs Dilip Ray

Kundan Yadav Vs The State of Bihar