Dismissed

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Sept 2024CR. MISC./49583/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail sought in a trial arising from a Maharajganj PS case under Sections 307, 326/34 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act. Earlier bail was rejected with liberty to renew after charge framing. Considering the petitioner's extensive criminal antecedents including multiple Section 302 cases and that the trial was likely to conclude within months, bail was refused.

What the court decided

AI extract

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49583 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2022 Thana- MAHARAJGANJ District- Siwan

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh Son of Vijendra Singh Resident of village - Rukundipur Ram Bhrosh Kunwar Ke Tola, Police Station - Daraunda, District - Siwan.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar Tiwary, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Asha Devi, APP

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 06-09-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P. for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with S.Tr. No. 204 of 2023, arising out of Maharajganj P.S. Case No.128 of 2022 lodged under Sections 307, 326/34 of the IPC read with Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bail application of the petitioner has earlier been rejected vide order dated 18.04.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No.10782 of 2024 with liberty that he may renew his prayer for bail two months after framing of charge.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner’s antecedent is not clean. There are 10

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49583 of 2024(3) dt.06-09-2024 2/2

¶19

criminal cases pending against him.

¶20

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner’s antecedent is not clean. There are 11 criminal cases pending against him including the present one in which he has been made accused under section 302 of the IPC in five cases.

¶21

Counsel further submits that progress report has been called for. From the report, it transpires that prosecution witness is going on and trial may be concluded within 7 to 8 months.

¶22

In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Therefore, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶23

(Dr. Anshuman, J.)

¶24

Prakashmani/-

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Rahul Singh @ Rahul Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Upendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vikram Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Bishwanath Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Mohan Chaudhary @ Mohan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Aman Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Asha Devi Vs the State of Bihar