Petitioner sought regular bail in a murder trial for killing the informant's brother by gunshot. Considering his criminal antecedents with eleven pending cases, the court declined bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49104 of 2023
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-6 Year-2020 Thana- RAXAUL RAIL P.S. District- West
Champaran
======================================================
JAGNATH SAH @ JAGANNATH SAH @ JAGRANTH SAH Son of Late Raja Sah Resident of Village-Pipra, P.S.-Darpa, District-East Champaran, Motihari
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Tiwary ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER
6 23-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
A.P.P. for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49104 of 2023(6) dt.23-02-2024 2/2
is in custody since 06.11.2022 having eleven criminal case pending against him, in which he is acquitted in two cases and rest he is on bail.
this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail application of the petitioner is hereby rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Sunnykr/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Should the petitioner be granted regular bail in a murder case under Sections 147/148/149/307 and 302 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Jagnath Sah @ Jagannath Sah @ Jagranth Sah
The State of Bihar
Dr. Anshuman
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
