Dismissed

Rajiv Pandey @ Rajiv Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Dec 2024CR. MISC./49100/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioners sought modification of a previous order declining to quash the criminal case against them. The Court found no grounds for modification and directed the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate to initiate the trial within one week after vacation.

What did the court decide?

Application for modification dismissed. Trial directed to initiate within one week after vacation.

Rajiv Pandey @ Rajiv Kumar Pandey Vs The State of Bihar — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49100 of 2024

¶2

¶3

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1490 of 2017

¶4

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2016 Thana- SHRIKRISHNAPURI District- Patna

¶5

======================================================

¶6

Rajiv Pandey @ Rajiv Kumar Pandey Son of Late Nand Jee Pandey Resident of at Surya Pramod Nilayam, Flat No. 101, Manna Singh Lane North S.K. Puri, P.S.- Sri Krishnapuri, District- Patna

¶7

Ranjita Priyamavada Wife of Rajiv Kumar Pandey Resident of at Surya Pramod Nilayam, Flat No. 101, Manna Singh Lane North S.K. Puri, P.S.- Sri Krishnapuri, District- Patna

¶8

... ... Petitioner/s

¶9

Versus

¶10

The State of Bihar, Patna

¶11

The Director General of Police, Patna

¶12

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Patna

¶13

¶14

¶15

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna

¶16

The Station Head Officer, Sri Krishnapuri Police Station, Patna

¶17

Ramchandra Jha Son of Late Langat Jha R/O- A/84, P.C. Kankarbagh, P.S.Kankarbagh, District- Patna-20

¶18

The Commissioner, Patna Municipal Corporation, Patna

¶19

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶20

======================================================

¶21

Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Suresh Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.G.A.9 ======================================================

¶22

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIBEK CHAUDHURI ORAL ORDER

¶23

4 13-12-2024 1. The petitioners have come up with an application for modification of the order, dated 27^th of February, 2024.

¶24

Having heard the learned Advocate for the

¶25

petitioners and the learned Advocate for the respondents, I do not find any reason to modify the order, dated 27^th of February, 2024, which was passed in Cr. W.J.C. No. 1490 of 2017, by filing of which the petitioner prayed for quashing of criminal

¶26

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49100 of 2024(4) dt.13-12-2024 2/2

¶27

case pending against him.

¶28

Since the criminal case has not been quashed, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Sub-Judge- VIII, Patna, is specifically directed to initiate the trial of the case against the petitioners at the earliest and preferably within a period of one week after vacation.

¶29

Let a copy of this order be sent to Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-cum-Sub-Judge- VIII, Patna.

¶30

In view of the above order, the application for modification of the order, dated 27^th of February, 2024 is dismissed.

¶31

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J)

¶32

uttam/-

¶33

Rajiv Pandey @ Rajiv Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajiv Pandey @ Rajiv Kumar Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jai Prakash Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Dr. Ganeshwar Pradhan Vs The State of Bihar

Veena Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Monawer Hasan Vs The State of Bihar through Mr. S. Sidharth

Prem Lata Vs The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary

Yashweer Kumar Vs The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary