Allowed

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC14 Aug 2024CR. MISC./49015/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail application, the single judge held that the petitioner, owner of a truck named in the FIR but not the accused, established a prima facie case for bail. The court directed the District Court to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail with bond and sureties within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Order for anticipatory bail with bail bond of Rs. 10,000 and two sureties to be furnished within four weeks.

Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49015 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-369 Year-2023 Thana- DIGHWARA District- Saran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Mukesh Kumar Singh Son Of Kameshwar Prasad Singh Mohalla- Sir Ganesh Dutt Nagar Road 3, Bhagwanpur, PS- Muzaffarpur Sadar Dist- Muzaffarpur

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 14-08-2024

¶12

Heard Mr. Rakesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing

¶13

on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Uday Pratap Singh, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

¶14

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 369 of 2023 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 353, 386, 188, 332, 333, 427, 504, 506 & 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevent of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984.

¶15

The FIR has been lodged as per the self-statement of the Sub-Inspector of Police, P.S. Dighwara, District-Saran that in course of inspection of vehicles, altogether 21 vehicles were seized, which were over loaded with sand and the drivers and other accused persons refused to show their identity and papers relating to the transportation of sand from the Mines

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49015 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/3

¶17

Department and assaulted the police force, as well as, obstructed them from performing official duty.

¶18

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is the owner of the truck bearing BR 06 GB 9502 and he was not present at the place of alleged occurrence. The truck driver has been named in the FIR and the driver has been granted bail by the learned District Court. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on bail.

¶19

Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

¶20

Considering the fact that the petitioner was not present at the place of alleged occurrence, as well as, the petitioner is not named in the FIR and the petitioner, being owner of the truck, has been named in the present case, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie , made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

¶21

The learned District Court is directed to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate –

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49015 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 3/3

¶23

II^nd , Saran at Chapra/successor Court in connection with Dighwara P.S. Case No. 369 of 2023, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

¶24

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner, as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner, as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.

¶25

(Purnendu Singh, J.)

¶26

Ashishsingh/-

¶27

U T

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mukesh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bipin Bihari Labh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Shobha Nand Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Izahar Vs Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd. and Ors.

Ashok Tuddu @ Ashok Murmu Vs The State of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Amit Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Manoj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar