Dismissed

Deepak Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC7 Feb 2024CR. MISC./4873/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition for regular bail in a case registered under Sections 363, 365, and 506 IPC for allegedly kidnapping the informant's daughter. The court rejected the bail prayer, noting the victim's statement supported the prosecution, but granted liberty to renew the application after six months from the framing of charges.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to renew bail prayer after six months of framing of charge.

Deepak Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4873 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2023 Thana- KAJRA District- Lakhisarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Deepak Kumar S/O Sahindra Chaudhary @ Lukho Chaudhary R/O Sahmalpur, P.S- Kajra, Distt.- Lakhisarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mukul Jee, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nityanand, APP

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

¶13

ORAL ORDER

¶14

2 07-02-2024

¶15

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kajra P.S. Case No.93 of 2023, lodged on 09.07.2023, under Sections 363/365/506 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

As per the prosecution, FIR has been lodged against the petitioner against whom there is an allegation that he has kidnapped the informant’s daughter by alluring her.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. The petitioner is in custody since 12.07.2023 having no criminal antecedent. Counsel further submits that the petitioner and informant both belong to the same village and they are Gotiya and due to land dispute this false case has been lodged. Charge

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4873 of 2024(2) dt.07-02-2024 2/2

¶20

sheet has already been filed.

¶21

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer

¶22

for bail and submits that the victim in her statement recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. has fully supported the case of the prosecution.

¶23

In this back ground, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner that he may renew his prayer for bail after six months of framing of the charge.

¶24

(Dr. Anshuman, J)

¶25

Mkr./-

¶26

U T

Deepak Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Nirala Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Dr. Ajit Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sudhir Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shakti Agarwal Vs the State of Bihar

Prashant Kumar Vs the State of Bihar