Dismissed¶18

Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahaton v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Dec 2024CR. MISC./48716/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail rejected; CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48716 of 2024, Patna High Court, order dt. 05-12-2024 by Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.; petitioner Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahaton; Naokothi P.S. Case No. 76 of 2012, Thana Nowkothi Garhpura, District Begusarai; Arms Act Sections 25(1-B)a and 26; Excise Act Section 47(F); illicit liquor manufacturing; live cartridge and manufacturing articles recovered; counsel Pritish Kumar Lal (petitioner), Gulnar Begum APP (State); application dismissed.

What did the court decide?

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of the offence, the court declined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail and rejected the prayer for anticipatory bail. ¶17

Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahaton Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48716 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-76 Year-2012 Thana- NOWKOTHI GARHPURA DistrictBegusarai

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahaton Son of Late Saket Mahto Resident of Ward No.- 17, Samsa, P.S.- Naokothi, District- Begusarai.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Gulnar Begum, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 05-12-2024

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Naokothi P.S. Case No. 76 of 2012 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act and u/s 47(F) of the Excise Act.

¶13

The prosecution case, in brief, is that police got a secret information about manufacturing of the illicit liquor is going on by this petitioner and his associates on large level, thereafter, police proceeded towards the spot and on seeing the police, petitioner fled away from the spot and on search police recovered live cartridge, articles of manufacturing of liquor from the spot.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48716 of 2024(5) dt.05-12-2024 2/2

¶15

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession or the house of the petitioner. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. It is further submitted that petitioner has three criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

¶16

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

¶17

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected.

¶18

Accordingly, the application stands dismissed.

¶19

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J)

¶20

annpurna/-

¶21

U T

Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahaton v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjit Mahto @ Ranjeet Mahaton v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bandari Devi @ Chinta Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Mansoor Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Khobari Rai @ Jitendra Rai @ Khomari Rai Vs The State of Bihar

Aftab Alam Vs The State of Bihar

Akhilesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Roy Vs The State of Bihar