Allowed

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC11 Sept 2024CR. MISC./48032/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought regular bail in a case arising from a police raid on hotels alleging immoral trafficking, with charges under IPC Section 376, Immoral Trafficking Act and POCSO Act. Considering the victim's Section 164 statement, fair antecedents and custody period since May 2024, bail was granted with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail on furnishing Rs.10,000 bonds with two like sureties, one bailor a close relative, subject to cooperation in trial, appearance on all dates, and no tampering.

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48032 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-270 Year-2024 Thana- GAYA KOTWALI District- Gaya

¶3

====================================================== Santosh Kumar son of Sanjay Kumar Village- Panchaiti Akhara Taj Colony Dist- Kotwali Dist- Gaya

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

Ashish Kumar Mishra, SHO Kotwali, Gaya Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Alok, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Raj Ballabh Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 11-09-2024 Heard the learned Advocate for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks regular bail, who is in custody in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 270 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 5 and 7 of the Immoral Trafficking Act, 1956 and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶13

Based upon the written report, the prosecution alleges that on a tip of flesh trade, the police conducted raid in two hotels. The petitioner along with Ms. ‘X’ and other persons were found in different rooms of the hotel in objectionable circumstances. Certain objectionable items were also recovered.

¶14

Learned Advocate for the petitioner contended that the petitioner has had a very good relationship with the victim

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48032 of 2024(3) dt.11-09-2024 2/3

¶16

‘X’ and on the alleged date of occurrence, they were just standing beside the hotel, whereupon a raid was conducted by the police and on suspicion, the petitioner was apprehended. The statement of the victim was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C, wherein, she has admitted the friendship with the petitioner. No allegation whatsoever has been alleged against the petitioner. Other co-accused persons, having identical allegation, have been allowed bail by learned Court below itself. The petitioner bears fair antecedent and now he has been incarcerated since 14.05.2024.

¶17

On the other hand, learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the bail application and submits that the petitioner is found indulge in immoral trafficking.

¶18

Regard being had to the submissions made on behalf of the parties and considering the statement of the victim ‘X’, the copy of which has been marked as Annexure-2 to the bail application, coupled with the fair antecedent of the petitioner and the period of custody, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-VI-cum-Special Judge of POCSO Act, Gaya in

¶19

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48032 of 2024(3) dt.11-09-2024 3/3

¶20

connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 270 of 2024, subject to the condition that one of the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows:-

¶21

(i) The petitioner will cooperate in conclusion of the

¶22

trial.

¶23

(ii) He will remain present on each and every date of trial till disposal of the case.

¶24

(iii) He will not try to tamper with the evidence or intimidate the witnesses to delay the disposal of trial.

¶25

(iv) In the event of default of two consecutive dates without any cogent reason, his bail bonds will liable to be cancelled.

¶26

(v) The court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case, at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take immediate step for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds, in terms of the above-mentioned order, shall not be delayed for this purpose or in the name of verification.

¶27

(Harish Kumar, J)

¶28

shivank/-

¶29

U T

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar Tiwary Vs The State of Bihar

Jagdish Ram Vs The State of Bihar

Harishankar Prasad Gupta Vs The State of Bihar

Raghunath Singh @ Raghunandan Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Tasir Alam Vs The State of Bihar