The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged robbery and assault. The court rejected the application, finding that the case involved committing robbery and snatching of cash, and the petitioner lacked sufficient grounds for the privilege.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4711 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-138 Year-2023 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran
======================================================
Kamlesh Sahni @ Kamlesh Sahani SON OF YOGENDRA SAHNI RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KOTHIYA, PS- MADHUBAN, DISTT- EAST CHAMPARAN
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Prateek Tandon For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Nand Kishore Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
2 17-02-2024 1. Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4711 of 2024(2) dt.17-02-2024 2/2
from the pocket of the informant’s brother, broke the laptop and stolen goods from the shop.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to the privilege of anticipatory bail given the allegations of robbery and previous enmity.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kamlesh Sahni @ Kamlesh Sahani
The State of Bihar
Anil Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
