Anticipatory bail application in a 2016 Section 498A IPC complaint case was rejected; the court observed the petitioner delayed seeking bail until 2023, indicating leisurely litigation, and declined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44787 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2 Year-2016 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna
======================================================
Krishna Kumar Mehta @ Krishna Kumar son of Ganesh Mahto VillageNakhas Pind Ps- Malsalami Town Dist- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nagadeo Choubey For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Asha Devi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER
A.P.P. for the State.
4. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
(Satyavrat Verma, J)
Rishabh/- U T
1 issue framed by the court
Should anticipatory bail be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in a 2016 complaint case under Section 498A IPC?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Krishna Kumar Mehta @ Krishna Kumar
The State of Bihar
Satyavrat Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
