The petitioner sought bail for offences under Sections 302, 201, 120B/34 IPC. The Court, considering the case diary and witness statements linking the petitioner to the deceased before the body was found, rejected the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44221 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-295 Year-2022 Thana- DALSINGHSARAI District- Samastipur
======================================================
Surendra Paswan Son of Late Ram Sagar Paswan RESIDENT OF VILLAGEKEWTA PIPERPANTI , P.S.- DALSINGSARAI, DIST- SAMASTIPUR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mukesh Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
4 13-11-2024
Heard Mr. Mukesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44221 of 2024(4) dt.13-11-2024 2/3
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44221 of 2024(4) dt.13-11-2024 3/3
recorded that the petitioner was having liquor with the deceased, both were abusive, he left the place and later, the dead body was
found there.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
perwez
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in a case involving charges of murder and destruction of evidence?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Surendra Paswan
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
