Allowed

Ganesh Kumar Ram @ Ganesh Kr. Ram v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC18 Oct 2024CR. MISC./44060/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail application in a Muffasil PS robbery case under Section 392 IPC. Petitioner claimed false implication; no TIP conducted and nothing recovered from him; co-accused already granted regular bail. Court granted anticipatory bail with two sureties subject to Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on arrest/surrender within six weeks on bail-bond of Rs. 20,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to s.438(2) CrPC conditions.

Ganesh Kumar Ram @ Ganesh Kr. Ram Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44060 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-241 Year-2023 Thana- KATIHAR MUFFASIL District- Katihar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ganesh Kumar Ram @ Ganesh Kr. Ram Son Of Shivan Ram Resident Of Varma Nagar, Police Station - Mufassil, District - Katihar

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Md. Helal Ahmad, Adv For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 18-10-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 241 of 2023 dated 10.11.2023 registered for the offences punishable u/s 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with two other co-accused persons are alleged to have entered the house of the informant and on the point of gun, they took away cash of Rs. 50,000/-, two mobile phones and some jewellery from the house of the informant.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44060 of 2024(3) dt.18-10-2024 2/2

¶16

this case. No T.I.P. has been conducted by the prosecution. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The co-accused person has already been granted regular bail by this court vide order dated 20.07.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 44607 of 2024. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶18

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court concerned, Katihar in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 241 of 2023, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶19

The application stands allowed.

¶20

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶21

Jyoti/-

¶22

U T

Ganesh Kumar Ram @ Ganesh Kr. Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ganesh Kumar Ram @ Ganesh Kr. Ram v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Vibhuti Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Ranjeet Yadav @ Ranjeet Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bablu Singh @ Santosh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Randhir Kumar @ Randheer Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Rahul Kumar Vs The State of Bihar