Allowed¶22

Ajay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC25 Jun 2024CR. MISC./43402/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Regular bail allowed - Patna High Court - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43402 of 2024 - Deodha P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024, Madhubani - IPC ss. 272, 273 r/w s. 34 - Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act s. 30(a) - 324.885 litres illicit Nepali liquor recovered from three motorcycles - petitioner alleged driver of one vehicle - no recovery from conscious possession - clean antecedent claimed - custody since 29.03.2024 - bail-bond Rs. 20,000/- with two like sureties - Chandra Prakash Singh, J - order dated 25-06-2024.

What did the court decide?

Regular bail granted subject to furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024. ¶22

Ajay Sahani Vs The State Of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43402 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2024 Thana- DEODHA District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ajay Sahani Son of Ram Kumar Sahni R/O Vill.- Jaynagar Near Sarkari Bus Stand, Ward No.05, P.S.- Jaynagar, Dist.- Madhubani

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State Of Bihar BIHAR

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ram Anurag Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 25-06-2024

¶13

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶14

A.P.P for the State.

¶15

2 . The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024 dated 28.03.2024 registered for the offence/s punishable u/ss 272, 273 read with section 34 of the IPC and section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

3 . As per the prosecution case, total 324.885 litres of illicit Nepali liquor was recovered from the three different motorcycles.

¶17

4 . Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the driver of one of the said vehicles.

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43402 of 2024(2) dt.25-06-2024 2/2

¶19

The petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 29.03.2024.

¶20

5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

¶21

6 . Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani in connection with Deodha P.S. Case No. 33 of 2024.

¶22

7 . The application stands allowed.

¶23

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶24

guddukr/-

¶25

U T

Ajay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raja Babu @ Raja Kumar @ Rider Vs The State of Bihar

Meena Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Dipak Kumar Yadav @ Dipak Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Madan Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Ravi Kumar Sao @ Ravi Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Om Narayan Kazi Vs The State of Bihar