Bail sought in NDPS case involving recovery of 08.5 kg opium/morphine, exceeding commercial quantity. Court noted the statutory bar under Section 37 NDPS Act and declined to release the petitioner, rejecting the prayer and directing expeditious trial.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43394 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2024 Thana- LUTUA District- Gaya
======================================================
Ramanuj Kumar @ Pramod Kumar S/O Ram Dular Sao R/O Village- Lutua, P.S- Lutua, Distt.- Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sharda Nand Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA
ORAL ORDER
3 26-10-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43394 of 2024(3) dt.26-10-2024 2/2
the petitioner also submits that the petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of the contraband. The petitioner is in custody since 03.03.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.
(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)
Rajorshi/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted where contraband above commercial quantity was recovered, attracting the embargo under Section 37 NDPS Act.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Ramanuj Kumar @ Pramod Kumar
The State of Bihar
Rudra Prakash Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
