Dismissed¶19

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC13 Mar 2024CR. MISC./4296/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Repeat regular bail application rejected for want of fresh grounds; offences under Section 376 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act (Rajoun PS Case No. 374 of 2022, Banka); prior rejection on 20.04.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 1104 of 2023; FSL report awaited; trial Court directed to conclude trial within six months day-to-day; petitioner in judicial custody since 07.08.2022; liberty to renew bail prayer; Patna High Court; Sunil Kumar Panwar, J; order dated 13-03-2024.

What did the court decide?

No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail application of the petitioner; accordingly, this application is rejected. ¶19

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Paswan Vs The State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4296 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-374 Year-2022 Thana- RAJAON District- Banka

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Paswan SON OF Naresh Paswan VILLAGE -CHORBAY, POLICE STATION -AMARPUR, DISTRICT- BANKA AT PRESENT VILLAGE- BHADWA, PS- RAJOUN, DISTT- BANKA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Bhushan Prasad ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 13-03-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶13

APP for the State.

¶14

The instance application for regular bail has been filed by the petitioner in connection with Rajoun P.S. Case No. 374 of 2022 instituted for the offence u/s 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the POCSO Act.

¶15

Earlier, the application for bail of the petitioner was rejected by order dated 20.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 1104 of 2023.

¶16

In pursuance to the direction of the Court, a Report with regard to present stage of trial vide dt. 08.02.2024 has been received from which, it appears that the FSL Report is anticipated to be produced before the Court for examination

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4296 of 2024(3) dt.13-03-2024 2/2

¶18

as witness and the learned trial Court had sought six months time to conclude the trial.

¶19

No fresh ground is made for reconsideration of the regular bail application of the petitioner. Accordingly, this application is rejected.

¶20

The bail application stands disposed of.

¶21

However, learned trial Court is directed to conclude

¶22

the trial within stipulated period of time i.e. six months on day to day basis, as the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.08.2022, failing which the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail application.

¶23

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶24

manishkumar/-

¶25

U T

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prahlad Kumar @ Prahlad Paswan v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhupendra Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Laxman Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Shailendra Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Binay Kumar Sinha @ Binay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Anand Mohan @ Rahul Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Saddam @ Md. Saddam Hussain Vs The State of Bihar