Allowed

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC20 Jun 2024CR. MISC./42786/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after alleged recovery of 60 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. Petitioners claimed false implication, no conscious possession and no criminal antecedent. Court granted bail considering custody period.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners released on bail on Rs. 10,000 bonds each with two sureties to the satisfaction of the court below.

Ramesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42786 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2024 Thana- MAIGRA District- Gaya

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ramesh Kumar Son of Naresh Yadav R/O Vill.- Maharaw, P.S.Chhkarbanda, Dist.- Gaya

¶5

Rajendra Kumar Son of Late Shiwnandan Bharti R/O Vill.- Maharaw, P.S.Chhkarbanda, Dist.- Gaya

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

2 20-06-2024

¶13

Heard Mr. Sudhir Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for

¶14

the petitioners and Mr. Choubey Jawahar, learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioners seek bail in Maigra P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

The prosecution case, in short, is that, 60 liters liquor was recovered from motorcycle and the petitioners were apprehended on spot.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material have been recovered

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42786 of 2024(2) dt.20-06-2024 2/2

¶19

from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is further submitted that the petitioners are not the owner of the motorcycle in question, rather they were passerby of that way. The petitioners are in custody since 03.05.2024 and have got no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 100 of Cr.P.C.

¶20

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

¶21

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

¶22

Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Maigra P.S. Case No. 41 of 2024.

¶23

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶24

Rajorshi/-

¶25

U T

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arun Pratap Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Ranjit Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Abhishek Kumar @ Monu Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Zahid @ zahid Vs The State of Bihar

Sushil Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Brijesh Yadav @ Brajesh Yadav Vs The State of Bihar