Dismissed¶16

Arbind Pandit @ Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jul 2024CR. MISC./41861/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Patna High Court, Cr. Misc. No.41861 of 2024, decided 22-07-2024 by Prabhat Kumar Singh, J. Petitioner Arbind Pandit @ Arbind Kumar (PS Case No.-84/2024, Narhatt PS, Nawada) sought anticipatory bail for IPC Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504, 34 offences; iron-rod assault on informant, bilateral hand fracture, grievous injuries; nine-day FIR delay pleaded; anticipatory bail rejected. Keywords: anticipatory bail rejection, grievous hurt, Patna HC, Bihar.

What did the court decide?

Having regard to the facts and circumstances, the nature of the accusation and the grievous nature of the injuries sustained by the injured, the Court rejected the petitioner's prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. ¶16

Arbind Pandit @ Arbind Kumar Vs The State of Bihar — Patna HC (2024) — LawSathi Research

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41861 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-84 Year-2024 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada

¶3

======================================================

¶4

ARBIND PANDIT @ ARBIND KUMAR SON OF GORELAL PANDIT RESIDENT OF CHHOTA SHEIKHPURA, P.S.- NARHAT, DISTRICT-NAWADA

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Krishna Deo Raj, Advocate For the State : Mr. Kalyan Shankar, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 22-07-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 354, 379, 504 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

As per prosecution case, this petitioner assaulted informant with iron rod causing fracture of his both hands, due to which the informant fell down.

¶13

It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to land dispute. It is further submitted that the F.I.R. has been lodged after delay of nine days and there is no explanation for the same. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41861 of 2024(2) dt.22-07-2024 2/2

¶15

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that this petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that he assaulted informant with iron rod. The injuries sustained by the injured have been opined to be grievous in nature.

¶16

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, nature of accusation and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected.

¶17

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)

¶18

shashank/-

Arbind Pandit @ Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arbind Pandit @ Arbind Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ranjan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Surendra Mahto Vs The State of Bihar

Muslim Kuraisi Vs The State of Bihar

Abrar Hussain Vs The State of Bihar

Niranjan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sonu Kumar Kushwaha Vs The State of Bihar