Allowed

Binay Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2024CR. MISC./41655/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Bail application under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act after recovery of 43.200 liters of liquor from a motorcycle. The petitioner denied conscious possession and vehicle connection, citing custody since 02.05.2024 and no criminal antecedent. Considering facts and period of custody, bail was granted with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the court below in Sikraul PS Case No. 54 of 2024.

Binay Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41655 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-54 Year-2024 Thana- SIKRAUL District- Buxar

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Binay Chaudhary S/o- Udaya Chaudhary @ Uday Choudhary Resident of village- Diwan ke Badka Gaon PS- Sikraul District- Buxar

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar Pradhan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shyam Bihari Singh

¶10

======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 19-06-2024

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

¶15

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024 instituted for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

¶16

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 43.200 liters of liquor was recovered from a motorcycle.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating article has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Petitioner has no concern

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41655 of 2024(2) dt.19-06-2024 2/2

¶19

with the alleged vehicle in question. The petitioner is in custody since 02.05.2024 and has no criminal antecedent. Petitioner has no knowledge regarding the alleged occurrence. There is no compliance of Section 100 of the Cr.P.C.

¶20

Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

¶21

the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

¶22

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

¶23

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sikraul P.S. Case No. 54 of 2024.

¶24

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J)

¶25

Arish/-

¶26

U T

Binay Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Binay Chaudhary v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gopal Sah Vs The Intelligence Officer, N.C.B., Patna

Chandresh Kumar Singh @ Chintu Singh Vs the State of Bihar

Shivnarayan Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Tufani Yadav @ Tufan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Achhay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Jamadar @ Pawan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar