Manju Devi v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
Five petitioners挑战了在其涉嫌一起2023年谋杀案的同一案件中被拒绝保释的决定。法院认为，鉴于案件性质严重（冷血谋杀），结合手机数据匹配和同案犯认罪供词形成的强烈怀疑，不宜授予常规定保申请被驳回。
What did the court decide?
Applications for regular bail in connection with PS Case No. 221 of 2023 are dismissed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40098 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2023 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua)
====================================================== GOLU KUMAR S/O JITENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ JITAN SINGH R/O DULAHARA, P.S- CHAINPUR, DISTT.- KAIMUR (BHABHUA), BIHAR.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
... ... Opposite Party/s
======================================================
with
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 40988 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-221 Year-2023 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Vipin Kumar @Vipin Singh S/O Uma Singh R/O village dulahara @dulahra, P.S. Chainpur, Distt-Kaimur at Bhabua
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether regular bail should be granted to accused persons charged with cold-blooded murder when there is strong suspicion based on CDR matches and confessional statements.
Whether the gravity of the offence and preliminary evidence warrant refusal of bail.
Whether the collective submissions of innocence in regular bail applications arising from a murder investigation merit dismissal due to strong prosecution case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Golu Kumar @ Jitan Singh
- petitioner
Vipin Kumar @ Vipin Singh
- petitioner
Manju Devi
- petitioner
Siraj Kumar
- petitioner
Santosh Kumar @ Santosh Kumar Singh
- petitioner
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court