Allowed

Prabhu Bin v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC4 Jan 2024CR. MISC./40250/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, apprehending arrest in a dowry torture case under Section 498A IPC. The bail is subject to appearance conditions and a direction to refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. Application allowed.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted subject to appearance and reference to District Mediation Centre.

Prabhu Bin Vs The State of Bihar — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40250 of 2022

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-758 Year-2020 Thana- WEST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- West Champaran

¶3

======================================================

¶4

PRABHU BIN S/O RAMAKANT BIN Resident of village- Majhauwa, P.S.Laukariya, District- West Champaran.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar BIHAR

¶8

RINA DEVI W/O PRABHU BIN Resident of village- Majhauwa, P.S.Laukariya, District- West Champaran. At present Address.- Rina Devi aged about 33 years, D/o Harichandra Munda, resident of Village- Bhuhrawa Done, P.S.- Gobrahiya, District- West Champaran.

¶9

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Arvind Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rana Randhir Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH

¶11

ORAL ORDER

¶12

8 04-01-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of three weeks from today.

¶13

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶14

3. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Tr. No. 4206 of 2021 arising out of complaint Case No. 758 of 2020 dated 08.11.2020 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 341, 494 and 498A read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code but the cognizance has been taken for the offence u/s 498A/ 34 of the IPC.

¶15

4. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons are alleged to have tortured the complainant

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40250 of 2022(8) dt.04-01-2024 2/3

¶17

mentally and physically due to non-fulfillment of demand of motorcycle as dowry.

¶18

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner who is husband of the complainant. The petitioner neither demanded any dowry nor tortured the complainant. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of "Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182." Learned counsel has further submitted that Section 498A of the IPC is triable by the Magistrate. Learned counsel has further relied on the judgments in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and Another (2022) 10 SCR 351 and Md. Asfak Alam Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr passed in Criminal Appeal No(s). 2207 of 2023 arising out of Special Leave Petition (CRL.) No. 3433 of 2023 . The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition.

¶19

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner by submitting that the mediation has failed between both the parties.

¶20

7. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40250 of 2022(8) dt.04-01-2024 3/3

¶22

of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court concerned, , Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Tr. No. 4206 of 2021 arising out of complaint Case No. 758 of 2020 subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, with further condition:-

¶23

(i). The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.

¶24

8. If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconcilation or one time settlement.

¶25

9. The application stands allowed.

¶26

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J)

¶27

atul/-

¶28

U T

Prabhu Bin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prabhu Bin v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Meraj Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar, Vs The State of Bihar

Bikash Kumar Sah @ Vikash Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Ali Hassan Vs The State of Bihar

Sanmol Kumar Vs The State of Bihar