A modification petition seeking revision of a 2018 bail-related order was dismissed because the petitioner failed to explain the inordinate delay of about five years in filing it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40193 of 2024
In CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66400 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1 Year-2011 Thana- DEV District- Aurangabad
======================================================
Vikram Sao @ Vikram Kumar son of Late Kishun Sao Village- Madanpur Durga Chowk PS- Madanpur, Dist- Aurangabad
... ... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr.Manager Sah, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr.Sanjay Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
3 04-10-2024
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40193 of 2024(3) dt.04-10-2024 2/2
petition is dismissed.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Shashi
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Should the modification petition filed nearly five years after the 2018 order, without explanation of the delay, be accepted?
Vikram Sao @ Vikram Kumar
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
