Allowed

Bandhan Kumar @ Vandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jul 2024CR. MISC./39279/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an excise case involving recovery of illicit wine from a co-accused. The court held that no items were recovered from the petitioner's conscious possession and granted bail subject to conditions under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted for six weeks upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of like amount.

Bandhan Kumar @ Vandan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2024)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.39279 of 2024

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-240 Year-2022 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Supaul

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Bandhan Kumar @ Vandan Kumar S/O Gajendra Kamat @ Rajendra Kamat R/O Ward No. 24, Supaul Municipal Council, P.S- Supaul, Distt.- Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Goutam, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh, APP ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 03-07-2024

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶13

2. The petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Excise P.S. Case No. 240 of 2022, instituted for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) and 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018.

¶14

3. The allegation is of recovery of 19.500 litres of illicit wine from the possession of co-accused Aryan Kumar.

¶15

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is submitted that the petitioner was standing with a bag from which 19.500 litres of foreign wine was recovered. It is apparent from seizure list that there is no name mentioned in the seizure list as from whom such articles were recovered and there

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.39279 of 2024(2) dt.03-07-2024 2/2

¶17

is no signature of the petitioner on the seizure list. The signature mentioned on the seizure list is of co-accused Aryan Kumar, who is full brother of the petitioner. The said Aryan Kumar has been arrested at the spot. It is submitted that nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Lastly, it has been submitted that he has one criminal case against him in which he is on bail.

¶18

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

¶19

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest / surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, in connection with Supaul Excise P.S. Case No. 240 of 2022, he shall be released on anticipatory bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise Court No. 2, Supaul, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C..

¶20

(Khatim Reza, J)

¶21

prabhat/-

¶22

U T

Bandhan Kumar @ Vandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bandhan Kumar @ Vandan Kumar v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The State Of Bihar And Anr. Vs Arun Kumar Jain and Ors.

Bhan Prakash Pathak Vs Lal Muni Singh Yadav

Umesh Chaudhary Vs Shambhu Kumar

Bashudev Manjhi Vs the State of Bihar

Pramod Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Safayat Mian @ Safayat Ansari Vs The State of Bihar