Arhuliya Devi @ Arhul Devi Vs the State of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3776 of 2024

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-184 Year-2023 Thana- GHANSHYAMPUR District- Darbhanga

======================================================

Arhuliya Devi @ Arhul Devi W/O Pawan Sada @ Sonelal Sada R/O VillageGoi Mishra Lagma, P.S- Ghanshyampur, Distt.- Darbhanga.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Asha Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 01-02-2024

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

¶12

learned APP for the State .

¶13

The petitioner has filed the instant application for grant of regular bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 366(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

As per allegation, co-accused Jiwach Sada abducted the daughter of the informant, namely, Khushbu Kumari. When informant along with villagers reached at the house of co-accused Jiwach Sada to

¶15

inquire about her daughter, accused persons assaulted her.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3776 of 2024(2) dt.01-02-2024 2/3

¶17

It is submitted by learned counsel for the

¶18

petitioner that the petitioner is innocent and she has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no specific overt act of allegation against the petitioner rather the specific allegation of abduction of informant’s daughter is levelled upon co-accused Jiwach Sada. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 01.09.2023. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶19

Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for Bail.

¶20

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner being a lady as well as period of custody, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail in connection with Ghanshyampur P.S. Case No. 184 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of

¶21

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3776 of 2024(2) dt.01-02-2024 3/3

¶22

the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned

¶23

Judicial Magistrate 1^st Class, Biraul, Dharbhanga.

¶24

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)

¶25

Nirajkrs/-

¶26

U T

Arhuliya Devi @ Arhul Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Arhuliya Devi @ Arhul Devi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bikesh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pawan Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Janardan Kumar @ Janardan Yadav Vs the State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar @Pintu Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Sahni Vs the State of Bihar

Pintu Kumar @ Rakesh Yadav @ Pintu Yadav @ Randhir Yadav Vs the State of Bihar