Anticipatory bail sought in an assembly-to-commit-loot case with recovery of a loaded pistol from a co-accused. The court noted the petitioner's criminal antecedents and that co-accused received regular bail, not anticipatory bail, and rejected the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.37408 of 2024
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-588 Year-2023 Thana- HARSIDHI District- East Champaran
======================================================
Saheb Patel @Saheb Kumar @ Saheb Kumar Patel SON OF SURAJ PATEL @ SURYA PRASAD VILLAGE- DHWAHI, DHOBITOLA, PS- HARSIDHI, DIST- EAST CHAMPARAN
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bharat Bhushan, APP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
2 02-08-2024 Heard the parties.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.37408 of 2024(2) dt.02-08-2024 2/2
there is no recovery from his conscious possession. The further submission is that the other co-accused has been granted bail.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioner apprehending arrest in Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 588 of 2023 under Sections 399/402 IPC and the Arms Act.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Saheb Patel @Saheb Kumar @ Saheb Kumar Patel
The State of Bihar
Rajiv Roy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
